This blog is about the poster which tries to answer the question: “Why is drill and practice-software still distributed? Do you think it’s useful?”
“Drill and practice-software” are tasks which belong to the learning theory of the “Behaviorism”. The behaviorists see the primary process of language acquisition in imitation, practicing, and feedback. Nevertheless, there is much criticism concerning this approach, for example, that this way of learning does not account for other types of learning or that it does not take the mental process into account.
However, there are many other learning theories which try to explain how one can acquire a language best. Nevertheless all of them do not explain the acquisition and learning of languages in its whole complexity. Therefore, one can say that there have to be a mixture of all the different learning theories which also includes the behavioristic approach of teaching and therefore the use of drill and practice software. This can be one reason why drill and practice software are still distributed, today because no one really knows what are the best methods in language learning/acquisition.
This is a fact which does not occur on the poster. But I think that this is a very important point to answer the questions. Nevertheless, I agree with all the other pros listed on the poster although I think that some points are missing, like the fact that learners can solve the tasks according to their own pace of learning, the training of certain skills (e.g. writing or listening skills), that the learner may acquire problem solving strategies, and of course the acquisition of media competences. Nevertheless, I agree with all the other points on the “pro-site” of the poster.
Similar things are to say about the con column of the table. I think that it focuses too much on the term “software”. Four out of six headwords focus on technical facts, like “you need to have a computer”, “some programs are expensive”,” you have to sit in front of a pc all the time”, etc. I agree with all of these points but I think that you also have to focus on the question of “why drill and practice tasks” and not others. I think that you also have to focus on the behavioristic approach of teaching and that you have to list disadvantages concerning this theory because, like I said above, there is much criticism concerning this theory and therefore also against drill and practice tasks. In my opinion this is missing.
Additionally, there is no conclusion on the poster towards the question “Do you think it’s useful?”. Maybe this was done deliberately so that everyone can create his own opinion towards the question. Furthermore, everything could be a little bit more colorful.
Summing up, I can say that I agree with all the points listed on the poster although I think that there are still some points missing, especially concerning the learning theory of the “Behaviorism”.
(to get an impression of the poster see the image below)
